Ad copy vs published policy themes for growth teams

Methodology: policy themes · optional AI · human review

Paste your ad copy before you submit it. Get a scored pre-check report — personal-attribute references, unrealistic promises, health/income claims, sensational language, missing disclosures — based on the rejection themes Meta, Google and TikTok publish. A heads-up, not an approval guarantee.

1. What the engine owns

Severity-ranked findings from pasted ad copy against word lists and patterns derived from the advertising standards Meta, Google and TikTok publish (personal attributes, outcome promises, restricted health/income claims, sensational framing, disclosure gaps). The rule snapshot is dated by the engine version — it is not synced with policy pages in real time. Demo is labelled Rule-based — never silent mock.

2. What optional AI may do

Explain or polish findings when a key is configured. Upstream failure returns 502. No invented findings, no quotes from text you did not paste.

3. What you must do

  • Review findings against the platform’s current policy pages before submitting.
  • Apply fixes in your own tools — AdPrecheck does not connect to ad accounts or submit anything.
  • Treat output as decision-support, not an approval guarantee.

4. What we deliberately do not do

  • Ad-account connections, auto-submission, or continuous monitoring.
  • Approval-probability scores — nobody can compute what a reviewer will decide.
  • Legal or advertising-law review, landing-page and creative-asset review — regulated claims need a qualified professional.

Open studio

Was this result helpful?Feedback